Commentary: The Long View: Reimagining the Caribbean – By David Jessop

  By

Today a younger generation of Caribbean women and men have begun to challenge many of the assumptions that exist in and beyond the region. They are in government, business, academia, the social sector, and the media. They are becoming more assertive, independent of the outside world, seeking change in the region’s largely inherited post-independence establishment structures.

Unfortunately, the political process and the creaking machinery of most governments is unable to move at the speed and global connectivity of the open world that they inhabit.         

Worse, intra-regional disputes, and as the region’s history with the Trump Administration has shown, it has become easy to exploit the endemic weaknesses, and economic problems most Caribbean nations suffer from, delaying delivery, and more recently dividing the region on ideological grounds.

As this column has previously suggested, by virtue of its location, smallness, and need for development, the Caribbean will continue to struggle to be the mistress of its own destiny unless it can achieve unity of purpose, new thinking, a clear vision, and real time execution.

My objective now, after working with and writing about the Caribbean in multiple incarnations since the 1970s, is to take a long view, ask questions about future alignments, and suggest the issues and themes that may determine the trajectory of the Caribbean in the rest of the twenty first century.

In the coming months, the first commentary will reflect on the changing location of economic power and influence in the region, the very real possibility this may in future change the way Caribbean states and businesses respond to one another, and the likelihood this will cause nations in the periphery and beyond, to reprioritise their relationships.

The Second, will consider what might be described as the ‘big fish-small fish’ problem, involving countries that say they desire economic integration but are torn between the imposed parameters of existing institutions and logic when it comes to determining optimum regional economic relationships, and size related opportunity.

The third relates to the alarming question of the Caribbean’s growing social deficit. Brought on by years of indebtedness and political mismanagement, a failing education system is continuing to foster inequality, and not enabling young people to obtain the skills relevant to the connectivity, services, and global opportunity that will in future enable even the smallest nations to succeed.

Fourthly, it is impossible to consider the future without addressing the extent to which ‘the enemy within’- that is, those involved in criminality, organised crime, and corruption – if unchallenged, will influence the future and may skew the region’s prospects, its democracy, and the benefits of accelerated economic growth.

Fifthly, this column will consider the pressing need to establish a shared basis on which to maintain and control the Caribbean’s natural environment, and to establish a new viable balance between tourism, agriculture, and extractive industries in the region’s land and sea spaces.

And finally, there is the importance of leadership, and retaining a vibrant, facts-based media, that is better trained, less parochial and more outward looking, able to provide information and commentary in a region that remains a bastion of free speech in a world veering towards populism, authoritarianism, and control.

Too many years have passed when little has changed in the way the region addresses change.

By now the Caribbean ought to have become a modern integrated unity that is strong, speaks with a single voice, pandemic apart is making economic progress, and is supported by an executive authority to which decision making has been ceded in well-defined areas.

However, long after independence and the establishment of multiple overlapping institutions, it is still far from achieving any of this, to the extent that it may be worth asking whether the idea of the Caribbean as a single entity, is real or just an illusion?

At best it is the positive expression of a vibrant, cultural, self-possessed, and sovereign identity. But looked at objectively it is hard to avoid the conclusion that the expression is not much more than a dream, and for the most part a geographic description imposed by the outside world: a colonial construct used for administrative ease that has outlived its usefulness.

As such, cultural identity apart, the notion of ‘the Caribbean’ may have become a trap, one that most outside the region and some within, fall into when it comes to problem solving.

While the designation is convenient for those who need to package the region for policy or other purposes, a much better way of understanding ‘the Caribbean’, may be to find a different framework for analysis; one that recognises that the region is multidimensional, overlapping, awkward, a model with many moving parts and peoples, stretched, fragmented, and divided by more than a million square miles of ocean.

Asking whether ‘the Caribbean’ really exists may seem a surreal, even absurd question. However, the desire for unity that the term signifies may go some way towards explaining why the region now finds itself struggling to deliver the singularity the name promises, to realise its potential, and why it devotes so much time to trying to achieve, let alone deliver common positions.

Geographically, the region is normally considered to be all that lies between Suriname and French Guiana in the south, Belize in the west, Barbados and the islands of the OECS in the east, and Jamaica, Cuba, and The Bahamas in the North.

However, a more functional future solutions-based approach may be to accept there is a common cultural identity defined by a shared colonial history of exploitation and suffering, that crosses the language divide, but increasingly separated by national identity and ever-widening alternative futures.

Put another way, within the all-embracing concept of ‘the Caribbean’, there may be better institutional ways to create a more effective future, one which ignores history, geography, smalless and separation, but is based on connectivity and all that the fourth industrial revolution is now enabling.

Reimagined, and probably asymmetrical and multi-speed, solutions that are wholly of the Caribbean’s own making will become of increasing importance as the chill in relations between the West and China seeks to draw the region into their webs.

David Jessop can be contacted at david.jessop@caribbean-council.org. 

Previous columns can be found at https://www.caribbean-council.org/research-analysis/

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • wally n  On 07/11/2021 at 1:13 pm

    As soon as someone brings up Trump at the beginning of a long winded useless Commentary……. “and as the region’s history with the Trump Administration has shown” …….you can expect an empty burger.
    You as with all the other “hedgers”of the past will soon be in the dustbin of history.
    Be brief, be firm, be direct, it is only your opinion. Highlight the failures, state possible solutions,and how can one address these failures without Guyana in every one of the solutions, makes no sense.
    These people are incapable of working together, and if not careful, will drown in Chinese debt.

  • brandli62  On 07/12/2021 at 10:37 am

    A better economic and political integration of the CARICOM member states, while preserving a maximum autonomy of the member states, is a necessity in the age of big blocks rivalling each other (China, Russia, US, EU). A model along the lines of the Swiss Confederation, which constitutes of 26 cantons that enjoy large autonomy, might be a working model for the CARICOM of the future. The central government in Bern is largely responsible for foreign policy and the national defence. Each canton has its own constitution and tax system and governs its own internal affairs. There is freedom of movement between the cantons and local business can operate in all cantons.

    I would be delight to hear Mr. David Jessop’s thoughts about my proposal and whether he sees a realistic avenue for adopting at least some elements of the Swiss Confederation to CARICOM. Personally, I see a problem that CARICOM has member states that are largely non-functional, such as Haiti.

  • wally n  On 07/12/2021 at 12:40 pm

    You shoulda been an ambassador, at least, consultant. If you deal with members of the Caribbean, one thing you learn immediately….everyone wants to be THE LEADER.
    Let us know how it goes with Mr Jessop, good luck.

  • brandli62  On 07/12/2021 at 3:07 pm

    Probably, the Caribbean nations are not suffering enough to consider serious steps of integration. Regarding the leader issue, follow the Swiss example. We have an federal executive of 7 ministers and the presidency rotates on annual basis from one to the next. The presidency is purely ceremonial and comes with extra duties.

  • wally n  On 07/12/2021 at 4:02 pm

    Then they will “disappear” the Swiss example looks good, only downside I am sure the Swiss did not come up with it overnight, older and wiser. My opinion of the Caribbean leadership… selfish, in many cases if you take the responsibility, country trumps (sorry) all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: