The International Court of Justice (ICJ) rules it can hear Guyana-Venezuela boundary case

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Friday ruled that it could hear Guyana’s case on the validity of the 1899 Arbitral Tribunal Award that settled the land  dispute with Venezuela.

Venezuela was criticised for not participating in the hearing on the jurisdiction of the World Court.

The Court said the judgement on jurisdiction is “final and binding on the parties.”     

The ICJ Decision

The decision was by a majority of 12 votes to 4  that the court has “jurisdiction to entertain the application filed by the Cooperative Republic of Guyana on 29th March, 2018 insofar as it concerns the validity of  the Arbitral Award of 3rd October, 1899 and the related question of the definitive settlement of the land boundary dispute between the Cooperative Republic of Guyana and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.

The President of the World Court, Abdulqawi Yusuf says the validity of the 1899 Award has to be first settled before resolving the boundary dispute. “It would not be possible to resolve definitively the boundary dispute between the parties without first deciding on the validity of the 1899 Award about the frontier that will bridge Guyana and Venezuela.

The Court, therefore, concludes that Guyana’s claims concerning the validity of the 1899 Award about the frontier between British Guiana and Venezuela and the related question of the definitive settlement of the land boundary dispute between Guyana and Venezuela fall within the subject matter of the controversy that the parties agreed to settle through the mechanism set out in Articles 1 to 4 of the Geneva Agreement,” he said.

The World Court, which is the highest juridical body of the United Nations (UN), unanimously finds that it does not have jurisdiction to entertain Guyana’s claims arising from events that occurred after the signature of the 1966 Geneva Agreement.  Venezuela claims the Essequibo Region on the grounds that the 1899 Award was null and void. For several decades now, there have been a number of incursions and tactics to scare off investors in Guyana’s gold, timber and oil industries in that region.

The World Court criticised Venezuela for not participating in the hearing on the question of its jurisdiction. “The Court wishes, first of all, to express its regret  at the decision taken by Venezuela not to participate in the proceedings of the court. The non-appearance of a party obviously has a negative impact on the sound administration of justice,” the President of the Court said. While Venezuela has forfeited the opportunity to present evidence and arguments in support of its case and counter the allegations of its opponent, but that would not affect the outcome. “The Court emphasises that the non-participation of a party in the proceedings at any stage of the case cannot in any circumstances affect the validity of its judgement,” he said.

The Court said it would take into consideration Venezuela’s memorandum “to the extent that it finds it appropriate” and that Venezuela was free to join the case at any time.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • kamtanblog  On 12/19/2020 at 6:42 am

    The ICJ based in Hague is just another part of the UN (corrupt diplomatic democratic bureaucracy) … not holding my breadth their decision will be accepted. Will UN peacekeeping troops be deployed to Guyana Venezuela Brazil Suriname borders ? Doubt it !

    Let’s see how this one plays out !
    USA will certainly step in to protect its vested interests in Guyana. Mobil et al.

    Maduro can have his little war with the mighty USA military but don’t think he is that stupid.

    He is quite happy to see all his political dissidents leaving for greener pastures.

    My two cents

    K

  • brandli62  On 12/20/2020 at 3:52 pm

    This is good news for Guyana. Obviously, Venezuela does not want to cooperate with the ICJ as they know that their claims to Essequibo are weak.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s