USA: Sen. Tom Cotton calls slavery ‘necessary evil’ in attack on New York Times’ 1619 Project

  • Senator wants to ‘save’ US history from New York Times
Tom Cotton speaks at a press conference in Washington.

Tom Cotton speaks at a press conference in Washington. 

@bryanagraham – Published onSun 26 Jul 2020  – The Guardian

He was speaking in support of legislation he introduced on Thursday that aims to prohibit use of federal funds to teach the 1619 Project, an initiative from the New York Times that reframes US history around August 1619 and the arrival of slave ships on American shores for the first time.

Cotton’s Saving American History Act of 2020 and “would prohibit the use of federal funds to teach the 1619 Project by K-12 schools or school districts”, according to a statement from the senator’s office.

“The entire premise of the New York Times’ factually, historically flawed 1619 Project … is that America is at root, a systemically racist country to the core and irredeemable,” Cotton told the Democrat-Gazette.

“I reject that root and branch. America is a great and noble country founded on the proposition that all mankind is created equal. We have always struggled to live up to that promise, but no country has ever done more to achieve it.”

He added: “We have to study the history of slavery and its role and impact on the development of our country because otherwise we can’t understand our country. As the Founding Fathers said, it was the necessary evil upon which the union was built, but the union was built in a way, as [Abraham] Lincoln said, to put slavery on the course to its ultimate extinction.”

Nikole Hannah-Jones, who was awarded this year’s Pulitzer Prize for commentary for her introductory essay to the 1619 Project, said on Friday that Cotton’s bill “speaks to the power of journalism more than anything I’ve ever done in my career”.

On Sunday, she tweeted: “If chattel slavery – heritable, generational, permanent, race-based slavery where it was legal to rape, torture, and sell human beings for profit – were a ‘necessary evil’ as Tom Cotton says, it’s hard to imagine what cannot be justified if it is a means to an end.

“Imagine thinking a non-divisive curriculum is one that tells black children the buying and selling of their ancestors, the rape, torture, and forced labor of their ancestors for PROFIT, was just a ‘necessary evil’ for the creation of the ‘noblest’ country the world has ever seen.

“So, was slavery foundational to the Union on which it was built, or nah? You heard it from Tom Cotton himself.”

In June, the Times was forced to issue a mea culpa after publishing an op-ed written by Cotton and entitled “Send in the troops”. The article, which drew widespread criticism, advocated for the deployment of the military to protests against police brutality toward black Americans.

Times publisher AG Sulzberger initially defended the decision, saying the paper was committed to representing “views from across the spectrum”.

But the Times subsequently issued a statement saying the op-ed fell short of its editorial standards, leading to the resignation of editorial page director James Bennet.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • michael hawkins  On 07/28/2020 at 4:05 am

    read history and one would soon see that the slave trade is nearly as old as mankind it’s self. Why don’t those that want to dwell in the pass look towards their tribal leaders selling their people into slavery. They sold them into it to the Arabs who took them to the cost then sold them onto the Europeans. Africans have been slaves for a long time as there are still Slaves in the middle east

    guyaneseonline posted: ” Senator wants to ‘save’ US history from New York Times Tom Cotton speaks at a press conference in Washington. Bryan Armen Graham @bryanagraham – Published onSun 26 Jul 2020 – The Guar”

  • carament  On 07/28/2020 at 11:06 am

    Revisiting the aged practice of slavery is not to be conflated with its historical review in the context of the birth and growth of the union. For example, if one stole and object and sold it to another who the sold it to someone else, whoever is found to be in possession of the object will be guilty of possession of stolen goods/property/humans. So let the guilt remain with the final possessors of the human capital, originally stolen from Africa. Hence, a large part of that guilt, is being able to confront and accept the re-write of “whitestory” to indicate the true nature of the evolution and development our country. The Times project is on point.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s