OPINION: Election violence shows need for power-sharing in racially divided Guyana


The dreaded oil curse seen in some small countries which became suddenly wealthy and which some commentators have been warning Guyana about has struck even before the expected billions of dollars has come on stream from newly discovered eight billion barrels of oil deposit.

The first shipment had barely left before violent unrest erupted. It was not about petro-dollar corruption, which was the fear, but the original bane of Guyana – tense race relations mixed with politics. This time it is over the purported result of the March 2 general election and the attendant turmoil is as wholly unnecessary as it is distressing.         

At the center of the dispute is the initial announcement that the ruling coalition of A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and the Alliance for Change (AFC), headed by President David Granger, has won the election. Up to then, the main opposition Peoples Progressive Party-Civic (PPP) was ahead by 51,000 votes but the Region 4 results put the APNU/AFC in the lead by 59,071, equal to a one-seat majority in the 65-member parliament. The PPP instantly rejected those results and they were criticized by international observers.

There was an unusual delay in posting the Region 4 results, which immediately led to suspicion that the overall outcome was being rigged. It did not help that the results were posted without the required verification and, also, that the government used the courts and the compilation of a new voter list to stall for more than a year the holding of the election after losing a parliamentary vote of no confidence which required it to resign within 90 days.

Still, there were reports that APNU/AFC was getting ready to accept the results and Granger would be sworn into office for another term. The PPP sued to block such a development. Also, officials from the U.S., Britain, Canada and the European Union expressed concern over allegations of fraud. “We call on President Granger to avoid a transition of government which we believe would be unconstitutional as it would be based on a vote tabulation process that lacked credibility and transparency,” they said in a joint statement on Friday.

The dispute has played into the volatile racial undertone which has characterized Guyana politics since the late 1950s. The concern is that with the historical animosity now unleashed, it will take a long time for it to be suppressed. If verifying the Region 4 poll result confirms a victory for the APNU/AFC coalition, PPP supporters will insist they were robbed. If the PPP is declared the winner, APNU/AFC members will refuse to accept the result as fair.

The APNU/AFC coalition was probably hoping that it would get enough crossover votes from Indo-Guyanese to return to power, propelled by long-standing dissatisfaction over allegations of massive corruption which dogged the PPP while in office. The PPP, on the other hand, must have been hoping that government’s closure of much of the sugar industry — a bulwark of Indo-Guyanese economic power – and the attendant loss of 7,000 jobs would have forestalled any such defections.

Chief Justice Roxanne George Wiltshire, who upheld the no-confidence vote and was supported by the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), ruled on last Saturday that she has jurisdiction to hear a legal challenge by the PPP to the way the Region 4 votes have been handled. She was due to start hearing arguments starting last Tuesday. She could allow the results, as currently published, to stand and confirm APNU/AFC as the winner or order that the Region 4 votes be verified, with the possibility that the PPP could be declared the victor. Her final ruling will probably be appealed to the CCJ, the country’s highest judicial body.

Whatever that outcome, this much is certain: one side will be very unhappy. And that dissatisfaction and its potential for large-scale violence, as seen in the early 1960s, will permeate Guyanese politics for the foreseeable future. The one solution still is for APNU/AFC and the PPP to form a coalition government so as to discourage the racial flareups which periodically haunt the nation and ensure the billions of dollars in revenue coming from the oil industry is fairly managed for the benefit of all Guyanese. If the political leadership cannot work out a power-sharing formula, the people must force them to do so.

Mohamed Hamaludin is a Guyana-born journalist who  worked for several years at The Chronicle in the 1970s and on publications in the Cayman Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands before emigrating to the United States in 1984 where he worked at The Miami Times, the Miami Herald and the South Florida Times.  Though now retired, he writes a commentary every week or two for The South Florida Times (sfltimes.com) in which the above column first appeared. He may be reached at hamal1942@gmail.com.


Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • BridgIt A Sam-Bailey  On 03/15/2020 at 12:56 am

    Mr Hamaludin, I am no politician, in fact I don’t even follow politics, but I have been following the outcomes of the recent elections where it was said that the vote counts in one region were rigged. That the computers were hacked. This resulted in a recount, etc. From videos I have seen the riots were instigated by one person telling the supporters “We have to mobilises”. These supporters then went on the rampage armed with weapons, attacking school children, and women, hurling racial insults, etc. This is Guyana in the 21st Century, is it? Of. course I remember the 60s. That’s when my father was almost killed. Why is it that only one side feels that they can run the country? Look at the improvements in Guyana, from CCIA to Ogle, dams are now streets, street lights, clean roads, etc, in ALL areas. A shared government would never work, because one side is determined to rule and take people back to blocked drains and the like.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s