Will the real colluders please stand.? Reason — Charges of Treason
By Yvonne Sam
Let the American people be the basis of inclusivity amidst the greatest political duplicity….. Mueller Report-Reason for charges of Treason
The Dems should not look askance but start working work on improving their 2020 chance.
Both the judge and the jury are out. Special Counsel Mueller did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone affiliated with it, colluded or correlated with the Russian government.
On May 17, 2017 eight days following the firing of FBI Director James Comey by President Trump the Mueller probe or Mueller Investigation began. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/05/31/politics/trump-russia-investigation/index.html . Consequential to Comey’s firing, over 130 Democratic lawmakers in Congress called for the appointment of a special counsel, while the FBI started investigating Trump for obstruction of justice. The special counsel’s office then took over both these investigations from the FBI. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/16/us/politics/crossfire-hurricane-trump-russia-fbi-mueller-investigation.html
What got the narrative started in the first place? Who were the initiators? Continue reading
Guyana Politics: Bharrat Jagdeo’s decisions have hurt the PPP – By James McAllister
The arrogance and hubris of Bharrat Jagdeo are not working for the PPP
After the No-Confidence Motion (NCM), Jagdeo had hoped pressure from his cohorts in the Private Sector Commission (PSC), and at the Stabroek News would have forced the government to resign. If this had happened, Jagdeo would have nullified a significant amount of the incumbency advantage the government enjoys. In addition, he would have forced election within a period when the government was still absorbing the powerful message its supporters sent during the Local Government Elections (LGE). There would have been no time for adjustment or correction.
However, once there was the combination of the government’s move to the court, and the Guyana Elections Commission’s (GECOM) decision to inform the President that elections were not possible before house-to-house registration, he should have adjusted his strategy. Once the issue moved to the courts, impartial observers accepted that the Government was entitled to due process. After all, this was not a case where the PPP won an election and the government was refusing to demit office. This was the case where the dubious vote of a government MP was procured under questionable circumstances. Continue reading →
Share this: