US Politics: Ruling Republicans know exactly what they have in Trump as president – BY Mohamed Hamuludin

In the U.S., ruling Republicans know exactly what they have in Trump as president


President Donald Trump

The unnamed Trump Administration senior official whom The New York Times allowed to write a commentary without giving his or her name did no favors for the American people, as the writer claims. Neither did the newspaper.

To be sure, the New York Times knows the identity of the writer and it is pretty clear did not have an ulterior motive other than to add to the debate on the Donald Trump presidency. But that contribution would have been more effective with a name on the column. It is quite possible that The Times was also playing catch-up with The Washington Post which, just a day earlier, published excerpts from Bob Woodward’s latest book, Fear-Trump in the White House, which was still to be released.      

Anonymous, who could be identified by the time this column is read, reinforced the basic point of Fear — that the ship of state has an unfit captain — and further asserts that the situation is so bad that those around Trump on occasion have ignored him and his policies, even sneaking at least two policy documents off his desk before he could sign them. The crisis is so grave, Anonymous says, that some officials considered invoking Section 4 of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution to remove him from office.

Anonymous claims that “the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of the country” and “The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House.”

“The result,” Anonymous tells the nation, probably with a straight face, “is a two-track presidency.”


Still, Anonymous claims there are “bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture,” including “deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.”

Those may be “bright spots” for Anonymous but not for many others. The ongoing deregulation frenzy benefits corporations and rejects the reality of global warming. The tax “reform” has enriched big business and has swelled the national debt. The military did not need to be made robust because it has always been so – and, in any case, robust for what purpose?

Ultimately, the Anonymous column poses this question: What would “senior aides” do when there is a president who is entirely rational and with sound policies with which they do not agree? The Constitution does not provide for a “two-track presidency;” as former President Barack Obama and others have noted, that is not how American democracy works.

Anonymous has been described as “gutless” and cowardly” for good reason. If the situation is so dire, this is no time for verbal sleight-of-hand. And the whole column strengthens the long-standing contention of some conspiracy theorists that there is a “deep state” comprising unelected officials and others who are the real power in America, despite what the writer claims.

But, of course, Anonymous and the other “adults in the room,” as well as the Republicans who control both houses of Congress, have never really wanted Trump gone. They embrace him because the same qualities which the writer decries have made him the ideal tool for reversing the progress of the past half-century at least.

Just name any policy which has sought to reduce the blatant disparities that continue to bedevil the nation – race relations, voting rights, women’s rights, workers’ rights, gender equality, environmental protection, criminal justice and law enforcement reform, refugee rights, education parity, housing discrimination, health care – and they have been or will be repealed. Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid are also threatened. And it is all because this president can be so easily manipulated by reactionary forces.

But perhaps the most distressing action of the Trump administration is the stacking of the federal judiciary with young white men vetted by the arch-conservative Federalist Society for their rightwing judicial activism, after scores of vacancies were kept open for them. Like U.S. Supreme Court justices, they will hold office for life. The Republicans knew this when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, refused for nine months to convene even a hearing on Merrick Garland, Obama’s nominee to succeed Antonin Scalia as McConnell prayed for a Republican to be elected president. They got Trump and Neil Gorsuch and are about to get Brett Kavanaugh and the highest court in the land is poised to remake America in their own image.

So when Anonymous says about Trump that “many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations,” he or she is merely reinforcing the belief that the crisis in which the country finds itself is a result of the work of enablers such as him or her, as much as of a president who is accused  of “amorality.”


Mohamed Hamaludin is a Guyana-born journalist who  worked for several years at The Chronicle in the 1970s and in the Cayman Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands before emigrating to the United States in 1984 where he worked at The Miami Times, the Miami Herald and the South Florida Times.  Though now retired, he writes a commentary every two or three weeks for The South Florida Times which first published this column. He may be reached at



Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • Clyde Duncan  On 09/14/2018 at 11:25 am

  • Clyde Duncan  On 09/14/2018 at 12:13 pm

  • Rosaliene Bacchus  On 09/14/2018 at 12:17 pm

    Excellent analysis by Hamaludin!

    • Emanuel  On 09/14/2018 at 3:05 pm

      Rose, back alley abortion will return to America soon. Women seeking end of unwanted pregnancies will travel to Mexico or Canada to get it, if legal in those countries.

  • Clyde Duncan  On 09/14/2018 at 8:34 pm

  • Ron Saywack  On 09/15/2018 at 1:47 pm

    A Constitutional Crisis of Nixonian Proportions:

    Mr. (or Miss) Anonymous alludes to the provisions of the 25th Amendment. For simplicity, I shall hereinafter refer to Anonymous in the masculine gender. He goes on to state that they did not want to precipitate a Constitutional crisis.

    He’s absolutely right about that because the invocation of the provisions of the 25th would immediately throw a chaotic Washington into a blistering constitutional crisis — of Nixonian proportions.

    Intriguing Scenarios:

    Recall, the Watergate scandal led to Vice-President Spiro Agnew’s ignominious resignation in 1973. President Nixon then nominated Gerald Ford of Michigan to succeed Agnew. Then, Nixon, facing almost-certain impeachment and removal from office, disgracefully resigned in August 1974, and Gerald Ford immediately became President.

    Now that he the V.P. became the President, he had to replace himself by nominating Nelson Rockefeller of New York as the new V.P.

    Anonymous understands what’s at stake!

    Thus, he, Anonymous is fully aware of the possible constitutional crisis/chaos any removal attempt(s) will bring. In the final analysis, however, it remains extremely difficult, expensive and time-consuming, to remove an unfit president from office as it requires 67 of the 100 Senators to vote in unison. Under the current climate in Washington D.C., that is highly unlikely.

    Therefore, Americans, and by extension, the world, will have to put up with the out-of-his-league Interloper/Narcissist for the next 2.4 years or beyond?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: