REVISING THE CUMMINGSBURG ACCORD – By Ralph Ramkarran

Ralph Ramkarran

Ralph Ramkarran

REVISING THE CUMMINGSBURG ACCORD

Both APNU and the AFC appear anxious to amend the Cummingsburg Accord allegedly on the ground that the reality of political office has clashed with the Accord’s constitutionality. A series of interviews over the past two weeks given by President Granger and Prime Minister Nagamootoo suggest that a review of the Accord is underway.

The Cummingburg Accord has two limbs. The first is the number of seats in parliament and ministries in government that each constituent party would be assigned. This apparently went off smoothly.

The second limb provides for the more substantive core of the relationship between the parties, namely, the division of responsibility in the management of the government. The Prime Minister was expected to chair the Cabinet and be responsible for domestic affairs except national security while the President would be responsible for foreign affairs and national security.

Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo has not been given the responsibilities of chairing the Cabinet or of exercising responsibility for domestic affairs. The contents of Minister Harmon’s regular engagements with the press suggest that domestic affairs reside with him and/or the President. In excusing the failure to observe the terms of the Accord, both President Granger and Prime Minister Nagamootoo indicate that there is no dispute arising from the failure to implement the Accord. They pointed to potential violation of the Constitution if the terms of the Accord are fully implemented.

There is and would be no violation of the Constitution if the terms of the Accord are implemented. Various articles of the Constitution allow the President to appoint others to execute his responsibilities. (See “The Cummingsburg Accord does not collide with the Constitution” by M. Maxwell in SN 24.06.15). The President can delegate the purely nominal function of chairing the Cabinet while he is present. The Prime Minister can take charge of domestic affairs in an advisory capacity to the President. The flimsy excuse of constitutional violation is an attempt at a power play by APNU. Supported by a surprisingly subservient AFC, it is not a good sign.

In any event, APNU and AFC are not free to amend the Accord. They are only two parties to the document. The electorate is the third party. It contains the basic terms of their post elections collaboration on the basis of which the electorate supported the coalition. The electorate understood that the AFC would have a distinct, decisive and visible management role in the affairs of governance through the Prime Minister. If the parties now wish to unilaterally tamper with this and consign the AFC, even with its unwise consent, to a vague and amorphous, consultative position, the parties should not be surprised if bitter fruits are harvested five years down the road from the same electorate, their third partner, that they have deceived. If that happens, this is where it would have all begun.

Having regard to the high turnout of voters, the percentage of votes obtained by the PPP/C, the votes received by the AFC in 2011 and the numbers at their meetings, there is no reason to suggest that the PNC obtained more than its usual forty one to forty two percent at the elections. The AFC therefore contributed eight to nine percent of the votes to the victory of the coalition. There could have been no coalition victory without the AFC. Five years from now there would be no coalition victory without the AFC, if the AFC loses its identity and individuality in the governance structure and operations, an individuality which it would never be able to retrieve as a political party with a distinct voice and appeal.

One of the major factors in the AFC sustaining its vote from 2011 was the maintenance of its independent character and campaign strategy, its promise of a fresh approach and youth empowerment. Had it been submerged under APNU, disaffected PPP and PNCR/APNU supporters would not have had the opportunity to identify with a political party other than APNU. Just as how the AFC attracted support by maintaining a clear and distinct presence and individuality in the election campaign, so it needs to maintain an independent political existence and defined authority within the coalition in order to sustain and even expand its support. The Cummingsburg Accord clearly intended to enable the AFC to do this. We do not know the reason that has caused the AFC to lose sight of these realities, or to appear so anxious to be willing to sacrifice the fundamental core of the Accord. This will prove to be its undoing and that of the coalition.

There is no doubt that President Granger is facing enormous pressures from within his own party. All the signs are there. But he has to lead from the front. He cannot succumb to the political culture of dominance spawned by a history of ethnic politics, which the coalition has promised to destroy by the very Accord that it now seeks to defang because it disallows the perpetuation of the culture. President Granger must inculcate in his supporters that APNU alone did not win the elections. They must understand that without the AFC there would have been no President Granger.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • detow  On 06/29/2015 at 10:28 pm

    Heads up Guyanese, read between the lines of this article and you will discern that this man is still a diehard PPPite at heart and appears to be setting the stage for creation of disunity between AFC and APNU. If there is a problem within the coalition it should be solved by the two involved political entities and not by a stark outsider hoping to earn points for a political comeback.

    Maybe I am wrong, but that is the way I see it.

    Endit.

  • Thinker  On 06/30/2015 at 11:46 am

    No ad hominem arguments, please. Everyone has a right to comment and if what comes out doesn’t make sense, we logically critique the comment. We have to go back to standards of informed analysis in the press and even on the internet. One can say that there is NO possible political comeback for Ramkarran within the PPP. He also failed to join the AFC when he could have been of service. He has the right to say things as he sees them.

  • Gigi  On 06/30/2015 at 6:45 pm

    Thinker, when I meet you in my next lifetime, in Dante’s Inferno if you’re headed there. I am. We shall enjoy some enlightening conversations, if you’re interested, of course.

    Prezzie did tell them they were going to get larwah. And lo and behold his words are coming to past. A clairvoyant and good man is our President Ramoutar.

  • Thinker  On 06/30/2015 at 10:03 pm

    Definitely headed there, once it really exists. But we can have interesting conversations right now once we are willing to analyse the known facts.The fact that Nagamootooo failed to bring in the numbers means that he can’t insist too much on anything, APNU should nevertheless be a bit more magnanimous.

    • Thinker  On 06/30/2015 at 10:18 pm

      Anyone else heading to the Inferno, I’ll be hanging around in the Sixth Circle wearing the Guyana flag.

  • Clyde Duncan  On 07/02/2015 at 1:12 pm

    I am a lost soul and I am not giving up this euphoric state for anything beyond the moment. All ya try wid duh, yeah!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: