CLICO: Duprey bagged TT$1.1b before bailout

Duprey bagged TT$1.1b before bailout

By Stories by Joel Julien

Story Updated: Sep 23, 2011 at 12:48 AM ECT

LAWRENCE DUPREY was paid $1.1 billion from the deposits of CLICO policyholders in the five years prior to CL Financial seeking a billion dollar bailout from the Government.

This was the claim made by Neal Bisnath, the attorney from CLICO, as he sought to tie up a couple of “loose ends” at the Commission of Enquiry into the collapse of CL Financial and the Hindu Credit Union (HCU) at the Winsure Building, Richmond Street, Port of Spain, yesterday.

On Wednesday, Bisnath said Duprey, former executive chairman of CL Financial, was paid a monthly income of $5 million by subsidiary CLICO.

In addition to his yearly income, Duprey was also paid multi-million-dollar consultancy fees throughout the year, Bisnath said. In 2007 Duprey was paid $90 million, Bisnath said then.  

Bisnath yesterday finished his cross-examination of former Group Financial Director of CL Financial, Michael Carballo.

“Were you aware that for the period 2004 to 2008 CLICO paid through CLF for the benefit of Mr Duprey through his company DALCO, the sum of $1.1 billion?” Bisnath asked Carballo.

“I was not aware of that at all,” Carballo said.

“And if we were to do the math Mr Carballo, Mr Duprey in effect collected between the period 2004 to 2008 a sum in the excess of $200 million per year,” Bisnath said.

In addition to Duprey’s billion dollar income in the five years prior to approaching the Central Bank for “urgent liquidity support”, CL Financial also paid a $21 million dividend to its shareholders, Queen’s Counsel Bankim Thanki, the attorney for Central Bank, said.

CL Financial held its annual general meeting hours before the first meeting with the Central Bank.

“We know that CLF had gone to the Central Bank and Government seeking urgent liquidity support in what could clearly be categorised as a dire emergency. Would you agree with me that it was wrong to pay those dividends to shareholders at that point in time?” Thanki asked.

Carballo said the dividends were paid to quell a potential “internal uprising”.

“Probably, but at the time what we thought when one looked at the potential effect of those dividends whereby shareholders made commitments for it and obviously most of them are family members within the Duprey trust it was that there would be a significant internal uprising that would have had much more catastrophic effects on CL Financial,” Carballo said.

Thanki said Duprey’s acquisition of companies could not be quelled despite the implementation of a CLICO Investment Committee.

The CLICO Investment Committee was set up as a result of a Central Bank stipulation.

The Investment Committee was “uncomfortable” about CLICO’s acquisition of Jamaican firm Lascelles DeMercado but opted to leave the decision to Duprey.

Lone Commissioner to the Commission of Enquiry, Sir Anthony Colman ,yesterday suggested that Duprey had the committee in his pocket.

“Did Mr Duprey have the Investment Committee in his pocket?” Colman asked.

“One of the problems is you find senior executives would fail to challenge the decision of a chairman because it is that exact chairman who would have to review and approve their incentive packages and contracts,” Carballo said.

Christopher Hamel-Smith, the attorney for Barbados firm Proman Holdings, is scheduled to cross examine Carballo today. ‘

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: